A former political adviser to President Bola Tinubu, Hakeem Baba-Ahmed, has criticised the current administration, saying it has failed to improve the quality of life for average Nigerians and governance.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Political Paradigm programme on Tuesday, Baba-Ahmed stated that the removal of petrol subsidy has significantly impacted Nigerians’ lives.
Baba-Ahmed, a former spokesperson for the Northern Elders Forum (NEF), said that the removal of the petrol subsidy by the Tinubu government has significantly impacted the quality of life for average Nigerians.
He acknowledged that reversing the subsidy removal was unrealistic but urged the president to tackle resource wastage and ensure accountability.
He lamented that the problem of Nigerian democracy is the selfishness of those who find themselves in various leadership positions.
Baba-Ahmed said the president should take steps to increase accountability and governance across the three tiers of government
“Nigeria’s leadership problem is a problem of those who have aspired to lead, who have had the opportunity to lead power and they have governed in their interest rather in the interest of the people who voted for them.
“If you have this kind of people as leaders, put them in the best country, if the leaders have this kind of values, they will do exactly what they are doing now,” he said.
He also called on the president to address corruption, insecurity, poverty, and infrastructure development.
“So much waste, so much abuse of resources and corruption going on,” he lamented.
He attributed Nigeria’s leadership problem to selfishness among leaders, governing in their interest rather than the people’s.
Baba-Ahmed said the presidents who have ruled Nigeria since 1999 have been worse than the previous ones.
“Nigeria is a tragedy. Even though we have a democratic system, the key element has been missing: that element is the idea that people elect leaders to serve, protect their resources, and use their resources to build a country that is in the interest of the citizens,” he said.
“Since 1999, every leadership that has taken over has been worse than the previous one. If you start from the first seven years of President (Olusegun) Obasanjo,
”I think, honestly, he did pretty well but as some versions of his critics say, he faulted his seven years by trying to see if he could get an additional term.
“President (Umaru) Yar’adua came into power and we had some kind of fresh air. Youngish president, visionary and strong but unfortunately, he didn’t last longer than two years.
“President Goodluck) Jonathan took over and ran the country aground. We fought against Jonathan because we felt Nigeria deserved better leadership than Jonathan.
”We didn’t realise that we were going to put in place someone who was not even to govern at all.
“Jonathan governed badly; President Buhari didn’t govern at all.
“Now, you have a president who started on a faulty foot and says: ‘I am going to become president because it is my turn’.
“Even if you forgive him for making that comment, two years into the leadership of President Tinubu’s government, we judge them by their record.
“They will tell you they are doing great with all the World Bank statistics, all the international ratings and everything but that’s not only the measures you measure a government; you measure by the way citizens live, and if that is the yardstick by which we are going to measure this administration, then clearly, the Tinubu administration has failed expectations that it was going to radically improve the quality of governance of President Buhari, ” he added.
